The diversity of liberalism can be gleaned from the numerous adjectives that liberal thinkers and movements have attached to the very term "liberalism", including classicalegalitarianeconomicsocialwelfare stateethicalhumanistdeontologicalperfectionistdemocratic and institutionalto name a few. At its very root, liberalism is a philosophy about the meaning of humanity and society. Political philosopher John Gray identified the common strands in liberal thought as being individualist, egalitarian, meliorist and universalist.
Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay - Paper Example Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay Liberalism is the attitude portrayed by those who are fairly satisfied with their way of life yet they believe they can improve it without betraying its ideals or wrecking its institutions - Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay introduction.
A liberal tries to adopt a balanced view of the social process and is usually known to choose change over stability, experiment over continuity, the future over the past. Basically, he turns to optimism when he deals with the issues of reform.
Conservatism is committed to a discriminating defense of the social order against change and reform. A conservative knows that change is the rule of life among societies, but he insists that the past not be forgotten. He is the complete opposite of a liberal such as in he the fact that he can be pessismistic about the possibilities of reform, he chooses stability over change, continuity over experiment, and the past over the future.
Lesson 18 Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt both worked hard to bring the nation out of the great depression. They both instituted many programs and reforms to try and save that nation.
We will write a custom essay sample on Liberalism vs Conservatism Order now More Essay Examples on Some historians even say that Hoover was the bridge to Roosevelt s new deal policy, however, these two men were very different in their ways of thinking and running the government. Herbert Hoover believed that the economic depression could not be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement.
He believed that the best contribution of the government could make, would be to encourage voluntary cooperation.
This method appealed to Hoover and he believed that this was how the government should get involved and do its part. Hoover created public works and construction agencies which provided people with employment and relief, however, as you can see, this relief was not direct.
He didn t believe in direct federal government aid but in direct relief of unemployment. By providing people with jobs, he decreased the unemployment rates and people started to earn their own salaries.
Hoover also looked to work with what was already present, reforming what was already present, than to actually change the entire system. He says, I have sought to make two things clear: Second, I hope that it will not be necessary to increase the present scale of taxes By this he was trying to balance the budget, which at a time like this was not very possible.
Roosevelt s beliefs were the complete opposite. In a sense, he was an extremist.
He would do whatever it took to get the country back on its feet again. Roosevelt was willing to experiment and try new things. Change is what he wanted because he stated: Who is there in America who believes that we can run the risk of turning back our government to the old leadership which brought it to the brink of ?
He wanted to overcome the depression, not let the country fall into the pit deeper than it already was. In order to do this, he had to run the country very differently than the past leaders because conservatism is what hurt the country in the first place.
He says, The most serious threat to our institutions comes from those who refuse to face the need for change. One third of the nation was poorly nourished and badly housed, men and women were laboring for long hours and inadequate pay, thousands of children were being induced for child labor, and more and more strikes were occurring because of the low pay and bad working conditions.
All of these problems had to be cured and Roosevelt promised he would solve these problems. In order to do so, he had to expect change, experiment, and live and care of the future and present and not the past.
Never has a nation made greater strides in the safeguarding of democracy than we have made during the past three years. Wise and prudent men intelligent conservatives have long known that in a changing world worthy institutions can be conserved only by adjusting them to the changing time.
Choose Type of service.Typical so-called conservatives. Circular firing squad. Go after those on our side because they may say one or two things you disagree with. Rush has done more for Conservatism than any of you that are bad mouthing him ever has. Liberalism vs Conservatism essaysIn the world of politics there are two very essential concepts that govern political thought and create policies and laws.
These two concepts are conservatism and liberalism.
Liberalism supports a more active role of government, policies to help minorities and the d. Conservatism and Liberalism often appears as two opposite poles and there are many differences between them to support this idea. Some of these differences in the past and present are religion, economy, culture, environment, same-sex marriage, death penalty, abortion and affirmative action.
Essays & Papers Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay - Paper Example Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay Liberalism is the attitude portrayed by those who are fairly satisfied with their way of life yet they believe they can improve it without betraying its ideals or wrecking its institutions - Liberalism vs Conservatism Essay introduction.
Nov 30, · Compare and contrast liberalism, conservatism, and socialism Nassir Hassan Politics Essays November 30, 6 Minutes Liberalism conservatism and socialism are social and political doctrines.
Free liberalism papers, essays, and research papers. Comparing Classical vs. Modern Liberalism - Typically Liberalism can be categorized into two different strands, Classical and Modern (yet some thinkers advocate a third strand that is referred to as Neo-Liberalism), each characterized by their differing and to some extent unavoidably overlapping attitudes regarding the theory behind the.